question:Sentence 1: This version was released in Europe and Australia on August 18 , 2016 , and North America on January 5 , 2017 . Sentence 2: This version was released on August 18 , 2016 in North America and on January 5th , 2017 in Europe and Australia . Do these two sentences convey the same information? OPTIONS: no ye

question:Jeff must have eaten the deep fried muffin. How would you consider the linguistic integrity of the preceding sentence? OPTIONS: unacceptable acceptable

question:What is the most logical completion of this news story?. Costa Concordia captain described himself as 'a victim' in television interview Francesco Schettino said he was 'distracted' by a telephone call when disaster struck Italian television channel has denied paying Schettino following complaints By Nick Pisa PUBLISHED: 04:20 EST, 11 July 2012 | UPDATED: 04:28 EST, 11 July 2012 Share DM.has('shareLink', 'shareLinks', { 'id': '2171871', 'title': 'Captain Coward describes cruise ship disaster as a 'banal accident' as he is paid £55,000 for interview', 'url': 'http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article2171871/CostaConcordiacaptaindescribesdisasterbanalaccidentpaid55000interview.html', 'eTwitterStatus': 'Costa%20Concordia%20captain%20describes%20disaster%20as%20a%20'banal%20accident'%20as%20he%20is%20paid%20%C2%A355,000%20for%20interview%20http://bit.ly/Nllocm%20via%20@MailOnline' }); Costa Concordia captain Francesco Schettino has broken his silence in a controversial TV interview and described the cruise ship disaster which cost 32 lives as a 'banal accident' adding that he did not believe it was 'a crime'. He is currently accused of multiple manslaughter, causing a shipwreck and abandoning ship after it emerged he had fled the bridge and escaped on a lifeboat while dozens of passengers and crew were still onboard the 290m long OPTIONS: 20Concordia. C2%A355. Costa Concordia. Coward. DM.has. Francesco Schettino. Italian. Nick Pisa. Nllocm. Schettino. eTwitterStatus. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article2171871/CostaConcordiacaptaindescribesdisasterbanalaccidentpaid55000interview.html. shareLink. shareLinks.

question:. members will know that this official opposition attaches great importance to ensuring that parliament clearly states its intent in any bill that we consider or that we adopt, because if we do not, and the government is often sloppy in this area, we simply hand jurisdiction by default over to the courts, and that has been done far too many times. Can we draw the following conclusion? The author states thats he believes the goverment is pretty messy upon doing it OPTIONS: Yes It's impossible to say No